Everyone loves a good legal battle… as long as we’re the ones watching from the outside as justice is served, rather than getting embroiled in a legal dispute ourselves. However, with so much going on in our busy and media-covered lives, it can be difficult to stay on top of the cases that are important. More on Fanak Baarmand arrest and other landmark legal cases in 2023 below.
Some of the legal cases that can be considered notable in history in the year 2023 are likely to be the Students for Fair Admissions versus Harvard College, the United States versus Texas, and Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency.
Noteworthy Cases in the Last Year
As the supreme court cases go, so go the minds and hearts of many members of our great nation. It can be, as previously mentioned, more than difficult to stay on top of each hot button issue our courts tackle day to day.
Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College
In 2003, the court decided in a case called “Grutter v. Bollinger” that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause would not stop the narrowly-tailored use of race in the admission plans of university, which were part of compelling interest in enhancing the diversity of a body of students.
Now, in the case of Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the challengers insist that a public university of North Carolina is actually violating the protection clause of the 14th amendment. They also insist that the Harvard College is accepting students out of discrimination against color, race, and national origin.
In the Grutter v. Bollinger case, the court decided that race-concious admissions programs, such as the one in 2003’s University of Michigan Law School, were acceptable as long as the government’s need to obtain the benefits of an education from a diverse student body was in place.
However, in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the court must decide whether the challengers are correct in believing that UNC and Harvard have both violated that decision.
The U.S. v. Texas
In this case, Texas challenges one of the Biden administration’s policies on immigration. Actually, both Louisiana and Texas are contesting this policy. Apparently, the Department of Homeland Security has argued that the government does not have enough resources to catch and deport all of the 11-million-plus illegal immigrants present in the United States.
This led to a memorandum which allows immigration officials to place suspected terrorist cases and criminal cases at the top of their priority rather than the deportation of all illegal immigrants.
The states challenging the administration’s policy claim that their territories are suffering financial drawbacks because people who are not citizens are forced to remain in prisons longer than is necessary, rather than being deported.
They also claim that the Biden administration did not complay with the Administrative Procedure Act because it did not provide the public with proper notice or the ability to comment on these new priorities of enforcement.
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency
Finally, in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, Chantell Sackett and Mike Sackett are back in court to defend their Priest Lake, Idaho plot of land and the home they want to build there.
Apparently, the first time the Sacketts attempted to build their home on this plot of land, they were told they were violating the Clean Water Act because they filled the plot of land in with rock and dirt without obtaining a permit first.
They then sued the EPA, and the Supreme Court ruled in their favor. Unfortunately, though, a remand of this ruling by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is pulling the case back into court to see whether or not the wetlands they’re building on should fall under the protection of the “waters of the United States” label.
In Conclusion
There are many cases being held in the Supreme Court that could be considered are important. However, after reviewing the environmental impact, the social impact, and the security impacts of the above-mentioned cases, it is clear that these three are in the top running to be considered landmark legal cases in 2023.
